What to make of Robert Kennedy Jr, the US Health Secretary?

 

US Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr responds to criticism.

(Please go through the shocking disclosures and also the comments in the end)

Yesterday, I retired 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices or ACIP, the @CDCgov external panel that wields the grave responsibility of adding new vaccines to the recommended childhood schedule. Over the coming days, I will use this platform to announce new members to populate ACIP. None of these individuals will be ideological anti-vaxxers. They will be highly credentialed physicians and scientists who will make extremely consequential public health determinations by applying evidence-based decision-making with objectivity and common sense.

I will also be tweeting examples of the historical corruption at ACIP to help the public understand why this clean sweep was necessary.

The most outrageous example of ACIP’s malevolent malpractice has been its stubborn unwillingness to demand adequate safety trials before recommending new vaccines for our children. Today, a compliant American child receives between 69 and 92 routine vaccines (depending on brand/dictated dosage) from conception to 18 years of age. This is up from 11 shots in 1986. ACIP has recommended each of these additional jabs without requiring placebo-controlled trials for any of them. This means that no one can scientifically ascertain whether these products are averting more problems than they are causing.

Many vaccine promoters have challenged this assertion. They are always wrong. Last week, @CNN, which has devolved into a shameless propagandist for Big Pharma, triumphantly announced that it had proof that my pronouncement that “there have been no placebo-controlled safety trials for any routine vaccines” was false. CNN gleefully proclaimed that it had found 257 placebo-controlled studies for routine vaccines.

So, allow me a moment to deconstruct CNN’s claims. Warning: this post may only be sufferable for science geeks like myself.

CNN is wrong. No routine injected vaccine on CDC’s schedule was licensed for children based on a placebo-controlled trial. In instances where a vaccine was used as a control, it too was never licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial. That is not conjecture. It is a fact based on FDA’s clinical trial data. (See sirillp.com/noplacebo). As Secretary of @HHSGov, acknowledging this lamentable truth is part of my promise of radical transparency.

The 257 studies cited by CNN unwittingly reflect the lack of safety trials underpinning CDC’s schedule. Despite CNN’s worldwide effort to crowdsource trials with a placebo control (per @US_FDA/@CDCgov, an “inert substance”*), this list, on its face, reflects that 236 of the studies clearly did not use an “inert” safety comparator in a trial to license an injected routine vaccine for children on CDC’s schedule.**

For the remaining 21 studies CNN’s list claims used an inert injection, 9 plainly did not:

• RCT 251, 252 (Varivax) injected an antibiotic, neomycin – not inert.
• RCT 84, 97 (HPV-16 and 16/18) injected aluminum adjuvant – not inert.
• RCT 215 (Almevax) injected another vaccine – not inert.
• RCT 55 (Lyophilized PedvaxHIB) injected lactose, aluminum adjuvant, and thimerosal – not inert.
• RCT 197 (Salk vaccine) injected 199 solution, synthetic tissue culture, ethanol, phenol red, antibiotics, and formalin – not inert.***
• RCT 168 (Dow’s MMR) injected full vaccine minus virus, including all stabilizers, antibiotics, diluent, preservative, and buffers – not inert.****
• RCT 189 (Menveo) injected Tdap+saline or Menveo+saline – not inert.
• For the remaining 12 listed studies which may have had an inert injection, none was a trial relied upon to license a routine vaccine on CDC’s childhood schedule:
• RCT 170, 171, 172 (MMR VaxPro), 228 (PCV11), 136 (Vaxigrip), 242 (Antitetanus), and 122 (Chinese flu shots) trialed vaccines never licensed in the U.S. nor relied upon to license a U.S. vaccine.
• RCT 124 (Fluzone IIV3), 102 (WVV/SPV), and 188 (Menveo) trials occurred after each respective vaccine was licensed, hence were not relied upon for their licensure.
• RCT 176 (Mumps vaccine) was not relied upon by the FDA to license the current MMR vaccine. (See MMR-II clinical trial report in link above.)
• RCT 53 (PRP-D) was for a vaccine withdrawn soon after its introduction and not relied upon by the FDA to license any U.S. vaccine.

While these 12 studies were not relied upon to license a routine vaccine on the CDC’s schedule, they do reflect that a placebo-controlled trial of a vaccine is possible. They also reflect what can be learned when a placebo trial is performed. For example: RCT 136 found the vaccine ineffective; RCT 122 found that “severe adverse effects occurred in 69 (0·6%, 95% CI 0·5–0·8) recipients of vaccine compared with one recipient (0·1%, 0–0·2) of placebo.”; and RCT 124 found “the rate of hospitalization was actually higher in the [Fluzone IIV3] vaccine group than in the placebo group.”

The unfortunate reality is that placebo-controlled trials, however, do not occur and have not been relied upon when FDA licenses vaccines for injection during childhood or ACIP recommends the shot for addition to the CDC’s routine schedule.

CNN would have reached the same conclusion had it reviewed the FDA documentation for each vaccine, instead of relying upon a random, crowd-sourced list from the internet. CNN’s list ironically proves the lack of adequate safety trials for routine childhood vaccines.

https://x.com/SecKennedy/status/1932580198198964241...

Replies to his tweet.

Dr Suzanne Humphries;

OK, but why not have anti-VAX on the panel? All we've ever had on the panel  are 100% provax . What's so wrong with having an anti-VAX? Why is that so taboo? So if you don't have anti-VAX, you're pretty much going to have provax. So weird. The same kind of weirdness that we were able to usher in Covid shots without proper testing with bullying, with meanness, with aggression, and somehow we're supposed to just gently reconsider them later and not abruptly remove them.

Dr Henry Ealy:

Anyone who is evidence-based IS anti-vax Mr Secretary.

There no such thing as a safe vaxxine.

All it takes is looking at a Media & Excipient Summary.

Only an idiot would argue that injecting babies with aluminum, mercury & aborted fetal tissue is 'medicine' FFS... sir.🙄

Dr Mollie James:

You have the support of millions of Americans.

We encourage you to keep going and pull mRNA as soon as possible.

Every day kids are exposed to this, is a day we get louder to push this necessary change.

My Stance:

Robert Kennedy is the first US Health Secretary who has acknowledged that vaccines are indeed problematic. Prior to that he has exposed the entire set up and the extreme harm caused by vaccines.

He had to occupy his chair stating that he was pro vaccine. The system, it has been explained, has legal backup and cannot be dismantled without following a process. If that process is not properly followed, the dismantling will be successfully challenged in Court and overturned never to be attempted again. Already there are court cases against the moves.

Now everything depends on the American public. They are relentlessly piling on the pressure. They want results. They are not interested in vaccines - the source of all modern day health wrecking diseases. They want health. They want health freedom. They want a genuinely health and wellness focused non pharma system in place.

Let us see how far this goes. Pharma controls the world. It has governments in its pocket. The day will certainly come when Robert Kennedy will be forced out. Or it may be that Kennedy is exposed as one of the gang. Both possibilities are real.

Then it will entirely be a public affair. Let us all build strong shoulders to bear that burden. It will not be easy and require tremendous sacrifices.

Till then I believe in exposing the system using whatever is being done and told, hoping against hope that more of those who are still enchanted by the system get to know and understand what is going on in the name of scientific medicine.

Inaction on this front equals siding with the criminals.

• We must capitalize on what Kennedy as a Health Secretary has done so far.
• He has removed the powerful big names who have consistently opposed reforms
• He has exposed the industry influence and extreme corruption
• He has questioned the drug and vaccine approval process
• He has proven that vaccines are not tested and the approval mechanism is in the grips of pharma industry
• He has declared that no one, let alone parents of little children, should trust the system
• He has put his own men in charge of CDC, FDA and NIH
• He has turned his attention to junk and processed food
• He has pointed out the harm from chemtrails
• He has set up a commission to look into why children are suffering from Autism, ADHD and other developmental disorders
• He has included 8 vaccine skeptics in his new immunization panel

However the CDC and FDA still continue to play truant. The mRNA vaccine research and approvals are still continuing. The mRNA vaccines are still being given. Kennedy, as Health Secretary, has so far not talked of a vaccine free society.

The American public are keeping watch on him. He will be under tremendous pressure to perform as per public aspirations.