The Truth Behind "Build Back Better"

Of all the new world order terms being bandied about, this one (build back better) deserves a bit of attention.

On the face of it, it seems innocuous and logical but it is a loaded term that lies at the core of the issues we are facing. Issues that stay unresolved. Issues that are ignored despite being of utmost importance.

This is not a new term thought it has received a fillip as it has been mainstreamed and is emerging from many mouths.

Why is this term loaded? When we say build back better what is the central proposition? It is destruction. It is only after something is destroyed that you can "build back better".

What is the other aspect? We need to question the word "better". What is better? Do we have a good idea about this better? Who is deciding what is better? Is it a democratic process? A democratic process will never want a collapse or destruction. It will seek to rectify anomalies such that the collapse or destruction does not happen.

But here we seem to have a mindset that is working towards destruction so that it can set up another system. That system will not be accepted unless there is a destruction, the people are rendered helpless, and they have no choice but to accept what is offered.

We are hurtling into a precipice. We all know that. But we are propelled by the notion that "my precipice is better than yours".

This brings us to another aspect. We are all at loggerheads with each other without any space for reconciliation. We are busy fighting each other. We are concerned about our personal on the spot victories in the face of a situation where the desired victory requires a combined coordinated effort.

When two people fight, the third benefits. The third is interested in the fight and flames it. He also takes great care to ensure that the gaze is always away from him. He assists both in the fight. He prefers to stay in the background.

We Indians are unfortunate that we cannot see through it. It is this strategy that felled us in the first place. The third party remains the same. The one that took over India and ruled it for 200 years. A gang of traders. They were called the East India Company. Currently the world knows them as the Illuminati. They are the super rich who manipulate the world through their investments.

This third party has a strategy called the Hegelian Dialectic (Agenda - Thesis - Antithesis - (solution) - Synthesis). The strategy is;

• Have a plan ready
• Create a crisis
• Allow existing crises to fester and lead to collapse or destruction
• Place the pre determined solution before the people as the only alternative
• Crouch the proposal in the nicest possible terms and pose that you have a heart of gold
•  Build the capacity to implement the solution.
• By the time the plan is presented you have the resource and experts whose capacity is honed enough to implement it. Thus it gets implemented in no time. 

This strategy has never failed so far. It has built a prison around us even as we are made to feel that we are free and live in a democracy.

How is the destruction being planned?

• Man made wars
•  Human enhanced impacts of natural calamities
• Human designed epidemics to implement pre determined "prevention and treatment"
• Induced food shortages and famines
• Economic collapse
• Digital collapse