The Covid 19 Enigma: What lies behind the facade?


The Covid 19 Enigma: What lies behind the facade?

Jagannath Chatterjee

In December 2019 a novel disease termed Covid 19 emerged from the city of Wuhan and its surroundings in China that was attributed to a new Sars virus termed Sars-Cov-2, 17 years after the Sars epidemic of 2003. The symptoms of the disease were noticed in other parts of the globe and a global Pandemic was declared by the WHO on 11th March 2020 based on the spread to 114 countries, 118,000 incidence, and 4300 deaths even as the spread literally stopped in China with just 24 reported cases.[1]

According to a study undertaken by the Chinese Expert Treatment Medical Group for Covid 19 and published on February 28, 2020 in the NEJM, the disease had various clinical manifestations ranging from fever and cough to ground glass opacity and bilateral patchy shadowing in the lungs noticed in CT scans. But not all had the same symptoms, patients often presented without fever and many did not have abnormal radiological findings.[2] The median age of the patients was 47 years and a total of 41.9% were female. Those with severe disease had comorbidities, that is they suffered from one or more chronic diseases, mostly hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Of the 1099 hospitalized patients studied 5% required admission to the ICU, 2.3% underwent ventilation, and 1.4% died. The study concluded, “Despite the number of deaths associated with Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 appears to have a lower case fatality rate than either SARS-CoV or Middle East respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Compromised respiratory status on admission (the primary driver of disease severity) was associated with worse outcomes.”

On 3rd February 2020, Zhou et al in an article published in Nature claimed to have isolated the Sars-Cov-2 on 7th January 2020, though the process is not very clearly described, and they mention the term de-novo assembly.[3] De novo assembly is a method for constructing genomes from a large number of (short- or long-) DNA fragments, with no a priori knowledge of the correct sequence or order of those fragments.[4] So isolation of a whole sequence is not claimed. This genome sequence became the basis of all further developments.

An article by Wang et al, published in the European Respiratory Journal, claimed to isolate the Sars-Cov-2 virus from Chinese health care workers who were laboratory confirmed cases of Covid 19.[5]  RNA was extracted from oropharyngeal swabs using a RNA isolation kit.  Then RT-PCR assay of the RNA collected was conducted to amplify and test two target genes. Then a computer model was built using various software. The authors acknowledge that they integrated information from 60 published genomic sequences of SARS-CoV-2. Full-length genomes were combined with published SARS-CoV-2 genomes and other coronaviruses and aligned using another software. The process indicates actual isolation of the complete strand virus was not done.

Information requests to Public Health England, Public Health Canada, the US CDC, and Health authorities in Australia have revealed that information regarding the purification and isolation of the Sars-Cov-2 is not available with them. The US CDC has admitted that it does not have a sample of the isolated virus.[6] This puts a further strain on the claims of purification and isolation.

Isolation needs to be followed by proof that the virus isolated causes the disease being described. When the US CDC led by scientist Jennifer Harcourt infected various human and monkey cells with the virus they claimed to have isolated from the first US Covid 19 patient, they found that though one type of monkey cells were impacted, there was no desired effect on the other cells.[7] In particular the human lung cells did not respond in any way to the virus.

 “We examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549) [lung celles], human liver cells (HUH7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T), in addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 [monkey cells]…No cytopathic effect was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells [monkey cells]…HUH7.0 and 293T cells showed only modest viral replication and A549 cells [human lung tissue cells] were incompatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

Another paper from Poland led by Aleksandra Milewska and published in Biorix studied the impact of the Covid virus on human respiratory epithelium cells and stated, “We did not observe any release of the virus from the basolateral side of the HAE culture.”[8] That is, the virus failed to invade the cells.

The electronic image of the Sars-Cov-2 is not novel. It matches exosomes and extra cellular vesicles found within the body. The genetic sequences of the virus are also not unique. They can match 100 other microbes and also 90 to 99 human chromosomes by 100%. Clearly something is wrong with the theory that there is a unique virus rapidly spreading throughout the globe and causing a disease named Covid 19.

Covid 19 has thrown up yet another medical anomaly. It is claimed that the asymptomatic are “infected” and are spreading the virus. As they are “infected”, often with high viral loads, they need to be isolated.[9] However this violates Rule 1 of the Koch Postulates that is a criteria to prove that a microorganism causes disease, “The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy individuals”. For that matter Rule 3, “Inoculation of a healthy individual with the cultured microorganism must recapitulated the disease” is also violated as the US CDC and Poland studies could not prove that the virus causes the disease. If the claims of virus isolation are not strong then Rule 2 is violated as well, “The microorganism must be cultured from the diseased individual.” Rule 4, “The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated, diseased individual and matched to the original microorganism,” is also not established if isolation of the whole strand remains a question mark. The virus has failed all the rules.

How reliable are the tests? Both the RT-PCR and the antigen tests fail to pass muster. Writes Mark Taliano in The Global Research, “We know that the PCR tests being used are not “fit for purpose”, that they are for Research Use Only. They are not meant to be used as diagnostic tools, and the late inventor of the RT-PCR instruments was very clear about this. According to the late Dr. Kary Mullis. “PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which becomes the ends of the amplified fragment. We also know that Coding changes to Death Certificates have fabricated false perceptions about COVID lethality. CDC coding changes blurred the important distinction between dying OF COVID and dying WITH COVID. Consequently co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, etc. have been largely negated and COVID has been relegated an artificially high importance in terms of Cause of Death reporting.”[10]

 Is there really a Pandemic? Did the WHO change the definition of a Pandemic? There is the accusation the WHO changed the definition in 2009 to declare the Swine Flu a Pandemic. “Since 2003, the top of the WHO Pandemic Preparedness homepage has contained the following statement: “An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”  However, on 4 May 2009, scarcely one month before the H1N1 pandemic was declared, the web page was altered in response to a query from a CNN reporter. The phrase “enormous numbers of deaths and illness” had been removed and the revised web page simply read as follows: “An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity.” Months later, the Council of Europe would cite this alteration as evidence that WHO changed its definition of pandemic influenza to enable it to declare a pandemic without having to demonstrate the intensity of the disease caused by the H1N1 virus.[11]

How contagious is the corona virus? In India a global literature review conducted at the Indian Institute of Public Health (IIPH), Gandhinagar, says that 80-90% of family members do not develop COVID-19 after a primary case is diagnosed in the family.[12] How dangerous is the disease? In India 80% of the cases are without symptoms, or asymptomatic. As per a Down to Earth report, 99% of the active symptomatic cases are mild.[13] Do the asymptomatic spread disease? A very large screening involving 10 million residents of Wuhan, China, found no evidence. They reported that 1174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases did not test positive.[14] 

Now let us turn to the public health measures that characterized the epidemic. Are the lockdowns justified? Globally they have disrupted lives and livelihoods. A petition titled The Great Barrington Declaration signed by more than 30,000 doctors, scientists, and public health experts, has this to say, “Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.”[15] 

It continues, “Covid-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza. As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e.  the point  at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity. “

Infectious diseases expert and University of Edinburgh professor Mark Woolhouse has acknowledged that the decision to lockdown in March was a “crude measure” that was enacted because “we couldn’t think of anything better to do. Lockdown was a panic measure and I believe history will say trying to control Covid-19 through lockdown was a monumental mistake on a global scale, the cure was worse than the disease.” The professor asserts that the impact of the response to coronavirus will be worse than the virus itself.[16]

The lockdown decisions of the UK and USA were based on a faulty model.  The Covid-19 modelling that sent Britain into lockdown, shutting the economy and leaving millions unemployed, has been slammed by a series of experts. Professor Neil Ferguson's computer coding was derided as “totally unreliable” by leading figures, who warned it was “something you wouldn’t stake your life on". The model, credited with forcing the Government to make a U-turn and introduce a nationwide lockdown, is a “buggy mess that looks more like a bowl of angel hair pasta than a finely tuned piece of programming”, says David Richards, co-founder of British data technology company WANdisco.[17]

In contrast a rival model by Professor Sunetra Gupta at Oxford University works on a so-called "SIR approach" in which the population is divided into those that are susceptible, infected and recorded. However, while Gupta made the assumption that 0.1pc of people infected with coronavirus would die; Ferguson placed that figure at 0.9pc. Neil Ferguson, who was behind the Imperial College coronavirus study, later backtracked and said 20,000 Brits may die from the coronavirus instead of his original estimates of 500,000.[18]

The lockdowns failed to obtain the desired results. Several studies have shown that they have failed to have an impact. Prof Isaac Ben Israel observed, “Some may claim that the decline in the number of additional patients every day is a result of the tight lockdown imposed by the government and health authorities. Examining the data of different countries around the world casts a heavy question mark on the above statement. It turns out that a similar pattern – rapid increase in infections that reaches a peak in the sixth week and declines from the eighth week – is common to all countries in which the disease was discovered, regardless of their response policies: some imposed a severe and immediate lockdown that included not only ‘social distancing’ and banning crowding, but also shutout of economy (like Israel); some ‘ignored’ the infection and continued almost a normal life (such as Taiwan, Korea or Sweden), and some initially adopted a lenient policy but soon reversed to a complete lockdown (such as Italy or the State of New York). Nonetheless, the data shows similar time constants amongst all these countries in regard to the initial rapid growth and the decline of the disease.” Several such studies have been compiled by the American Institute for Economic Research.[19]

Alarmed by the flood of information against the Pandemic and the lockdowns by credible doctors and medical scientists, a concerted effort was made to censor the flow. The United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications, Melissa Fleming said while launching a digital “Verified” initiative on 21st May 2020, “COVID-19 is not just this century’s largest public health emergency, but also a communication crisis.”[20] We need to empower everyday people to spread factual trusted information with their friends, families and social networks.” This was followed by an unprecedented attack on the freedom of expression by deleting social media and YouTube channels through which experts were communicating with the public.

However on 1st June 2020 a German report came out with damning accusations.  Some of the report key passages are; the dangerousness of Covid-19 was overestimated: probably at no point did the danger posed by the new virus go beyond the normal level, The people who die from Corona are essentially those who would statistically die this year, because they have reached the end of their lives and their weakened bodies can no longer cope with any random everyday stress. Worldwide, within a quarter of a year, there have been no more than 250,000 deaths from Covid-19, compared to 1.5 million deaths during the influenza wave 2017/18. The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm.[21]

More criticism followed from within the medical community. Kamran Abbasi, executive editor of the British medical Journal (BMJ) lashed out by writing in the journal, “Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health. Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science. When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die.”[22]

Covid is not only about corruption in execution and during the emergency. There appears to be a long drawn out plan to usher in the crisis. Dr Jacob Puliyel of India an ex member of the NTAGI (National Technical Group on Immunization) highlighted this when he  pointed out that in October 2019, the Johns Hopkins University, the World Economic Forum, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation had conducted Event 201. “The participants of Event 201 discussed every detail of how the world should be locked down, how news and social media would have to be controlled, how the stock market would crash, how public unrest should be dealt with and how leaders who fall out of line should be counteracted by their counterparts in other countries.”[23] A second wave was also discussed.

This is not all. The Rockefeller Foundation released a document titled “Scenario for the Future of Technology and International Development” in 2010 that spoke of the Lockstep, beginning with an epidemic that brings the world to a halt to bring in a great social and economic change. The document predicted the following scenario, ““During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.”[24]

There is more. In 2017 Dr Anthony Fauci had spoken about a surprise disease outbreak during the tenure of Donald Trump.[25] In 2018 The Institute for Disease Modeling made a video in which they show a flu virus originating in China, from the area of Wuhan, and spreading all over the world, killing millions. They called it ‘A Simulation For A Global Flu Pandemic.’[26] In 2017 Bill Gates has foreseen a global epidemic that would kill 30 million.[27] In September 2019 the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board released a report titled ‘A World At Risk’. It stressed the need to be prepared for a coronavirus outbreak.[28]

Preparations on the ground too were in full swing. Data from the World Integrated Trade Solution showed that in 2017 and 2018 - two years before COVID-19 - hundreds of millions of test kits for COVID-19 were distributed worldwide.[29] The name was changed to “medical test kits” after a hue and cry ensued but the product code data still throws up “Covid 19 test kits”. The World Bank website shows that COVID-19 is a project that is planned from 1st April 2020 to 31st March 2025.[30]

Covid 19 is obviously a political agenda with serious ramifications. What is the goal beyond the obvious economic and social reset? In 1992, Dr. John Coleman, CIA Intelligence Officer who wrote a book titled “The Committee of 300” stated, ‘At least 4 billion useless eaters shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars and organized epidemics of fatal rapid acting diseases.’

After the lockdown and quarantines the next public health measure is a global mass vaccination programme. Is the programme warranted? Prof Amitav Bannerjee, a community medicine expert, has pointed out that India is past the peak in the number of cases and there is a marked downward trend. He says that the country is very close to achieving herd immunity and feels that a mass vaccination programme is not needed.

"Perhaps, we are moving towards herd immunity because in India the cases are coming down. It is good for us Indians to follow our own data based on the emerging cases, do research and not rely on the western data and rate of occurrence there. Relying on western data might lead us in trouble as the demographic conditions of India are quite different than those of western countries," He said the recovery rate of COVID-19 patients in India is 99 per cent vis-a-vis 97 per cent globally.[31]

The clinical trials are a sure indicator that things are not hunky dory.[1] What queers the pitch is that doctors and scientists studying the Covid vaccine trial protocols have revealed that the trials are not about checking infection or transmission, preventing serious cases that lead to hospitalization and deaths. [2] Pune-based public health specialist Dr Anant Phadke said the main issue with the vaccine is lack of transparency. "There seems to be a rush to get approvals and start the vaccination process. We need empirical evidence that the vaccine works for Indians. Without prejudging the vaccine, we should wait for the results and analyse them," he said. While trials done so far say the vaccine offers protection, there is still a question mark over its ability to stop transmission. "Only one of trials is looking at the transmission aspect. Others are not even tracking it."[3]So what is the purpose of this largest vaccination exercise in history? Is there an agenda behind the exercise? Is this crisis so great that two vaccines 21 days apart should become an annual exercise?

What does this vaccine really intend to do? The answer to this question opens the Pandora’s Box.  Various agendas could be intertwined and find expression through this vaccine. A peer reviewed article that awaits publication has this to say;

“The coronavirus vaccines currently dominating the headlines represent something likely to go far beyond the simple health intervention being held out by scientists and officials as a panacea. Instead, the evidence suggests that Covid-19 vaccines are intended to serve as a Trojan horse to transport invasive technologies into people’s brains and bodies. These technologies could include brain-machine interface nanotechnology, digital identity tracking devices, technology that can be turned on and off remotely, and cryptocurrency-compatible chips (Fitts, 2020b)."[1]

Covid 19 does not appear to be a health crisis. It is an organized event that facilitates the “Great Reset” as admitted by Klaus Schwab, the Founder President of the World Economic Forum. He envisions a society where “the people will own nothing and be happy.” He wants a total transformation.[2]

"To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed.”

That goal will not be smooth and we can expect upheavals along the way. However what authority does the World Economic Forum and corporate philanthropists like Bill Gates have to decide which way the world should go? There is need to discuss and debate the work in progress. We do not need corporate socialism; we need a loving and caring truthful society that can take care of the world and its inhabitants in a caring and humane manner using natural laws for the good of all. We have not elected our political representatives to represent corporate entities and their ambitions. They should work for the people who have voted them to power.


 There is an article that points out that the virus has been isolated. 

 It seems initially computer models were used up to January 2020, later the whole strand virus was isolated. However Dr Thomas Cowan investigated 31 of these reports and came to the conclusion that purification and isolation is not the end result. Most of these reports admit that.

(A person investigating writes: For what it’s worth, I spoke with an accomplished immunologist today who said that the 4 or 5 papers claiming to isolate and purify the virus admit in the body of those same papers that they have not done so. This immunologist continued by saying that it has not been proven whether the virus does or does not exist. Another scientist I spoke with before Christmas said the-aperture claiming isolation from a patient in WA was not isolation and purification. I’m not a scientist, but to me having a genetic sequence that is admitted to in part be generated by computer is not proof of an actual virus. That said, I’m not arguing there is no virus. But assuming there is a virus, what evidence is there that it causes the symptoms it’s purported to cause? Apologies if I’ve missed that evidence and it exists, to my belief it doesn’t.)

Why are there voices against the virus?  Criticisms against the germ and virus theory dates back to the time of Pasteur. I have written on that here;

"It is time to admit the germ theory is wrong" 

 While I would urge you to go through the entire article, In short, the problems are;

- "Does the flies create the waste heap, or does the waste heap attract the flies"?

- Why are toxins not the focus of attention? We are living in a sea of toxins

- Why are junk foods not blamed?

- Why is pollution not blamed?

- The "germ and virus theory deflects attention from ill health

- Is it possible that we are all healthy and "catching diseases"?

- The germ and virus theory protects the industry and presents a wonderful ongoing business opportunity

- Pasteur's secret diary has revealed a lot and there is no interest in discussing it

- The germ theory is perpetuated by negating the Koch Postulates (and even the Rivers Postulates) and thereby leaving the theory open to interpretations to the advantage of the industry

- Germs and viruses are the foot soldiers of health. They help the body detoxify. They cause elimination symptoms. Acute diseases are not diseases to be feared. They are how the body detoxifies, eliminates waste matter, and rectifies anomalies

- The flu is a detoxification function the body indulges in. A sluggish lymphatic system leaves accumulated waste in the body that is cleared by the flu. The more toxic the waste the more violent the flu. By obstructing the process we do untold damage

- Acute diseases are essential for the body to rectify anomalies and regain health

 Here is another article to ponder about.

"We are suffering due to toxicity"

 Some have also written why I have not mentioned the possibility of a lab released virus. My arguments are;

- It could be a plant to induce fear

- The boogie of a bioterrorism agent enabled the WHO to put in place a clinical trial using deadly, and now discredited, drugs and procedures that really led to fatalities

- The "virus" is being blamed for treatment adverse effects

- The virus will be in place and covering up for vaccine, GMOs and 5G adverse effects

- It will continually be the ruse for stricter lockdowns and other punitive measures

 And in parting;

How did we fall for the germ and virus theory? 

 And also;

Covid 19: Fear is being unnecessarily induced

Here is a collection of articles on the subject by a researcher.

"Here is for those who dare to question current events and that have an open mind. It's a lot of information and resources presented here that result in the conclusion that there is NO "virus", there never was. This is probably one of the most comprehensive articles on social media regarding current events and fraud. I don't expect people to go through it all because this has taken me many months to research. I will continue to update my article linked below regarding the inconvenient facts about current events as we move forward."


From  a private medical forum;

 An MD writes;

We've proven this is an illness with very defined features. We have not, however, proven that a virus is at the root of this illness, leading to these symptoms.

As a resident, I remember how we'd sit through morning rounds and listen to cases admitted from the night before, and then go through an entire differential diagnosis, trying to figure out what factors/diseases could be contributing to the presentation of the patient's symptoms. We have not done that with this illness. 

Any attempt by physicians to speak their experience that this illness presents unlike any they have ever seen, not consistent with typical acute respiratory distress syndrome, have been censored. 

What creates an illness where patients are able to ventilate, but not oxygenate? What causes a blood disorder like this? What uncouples oxygen from red blood cells? What promotes increased clotting in veins and arteries? What makes the olfactory and gustatory nerves go numb? What promotes neurological symptoms that linger?

Environmental toxins? Air pollutants? Electromagnetic radiation? Metals? Poisons? Parasites? Gases? Bacteria? Let's do a differential diagnosis


2nd Post;

 The assumption I see taken here is that the presence of the SARS-COV2 virus in the nasal cavity is being equated with an infection. This is not the case. The presence of virus or viral DNA is not equivalent to infection. And, the PCR test to detect this virus is faulty, and cannot distinguish between the presence of a virus, and the presence of viral genetic material, or debris. In addition, the test is less reliable in a person who is asymptomatic, and was never intended to detect infection in anyone, asymptomatic or symptomatic. 

So, no one really knows what is being isolated when the PCR test is done, or how many CT (cycle thresholds) are being used for each person tested, since the test is not standardized. So the swab tests are not reliable, and don't give us any legitimate information about what people have in the nasal cavities, or whether the virus is something inhaled from outside the body, produced from inside the body, or part of the virome emitted from the bacteria lining the mucus cavity of the nose or, a contaminant. If the CT threshold is above 35, the test will more than likely include even environmental debris that could falsely signal a positive test result. 

Back to my above statement, the presence of virus or viral DNA is not equivalent to infection. I remember a toddler in my practice who had a high fever and went to the ER a few years ago. The ER doctor did a nasal swab and the test results came back positive for 7 viruses in his nasal cavity. So, what was the cause of his illness? Did the viruses come from outside his body, inside his body, from inside the bacteria lining his nasal cavity and airways? Was his illness a viral illness, at all, or something else? 

If we don't look for different viruses in the nasal cavity of asymptomatic and symptomatic people, we will cherry pick what we want to find, and only see 1 virus.

If we swabbed asymptomatic and symptomatic people we could find dozens, if not hundreds, if not thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of viruses lining the nasal cavity, throat, skin, anus, stool, etc. In fact, the scientific literature points out that we know of a minimum of 43% of our own genome embedded with the genetic material to make viruses and virus-like particles. These viruses and virus-like particles are emitted from within our own nuclei in response to epigenetic factors. In addition, the linings of the body contain greater than 100 trillion bacteria, many, or all of which, can carry the genetic material of viruses, to be expressed at any time. 

The idea that viruses only come to the body from the outside, and are only transmitted from person-to-person is old, tired, outdated, and will shortly be a thing of the past. We breathe in viruses all the time, and nothing happens to us. How many viruses do we need to breathe in in order for us to get sick?

The idea that our exposure to viruses is an automatic infection is also outdated and a thing of the past. Viruses have no ability to replicate. We assume they enter a cell and cause damage but, no human alive has ever seen the action of a virus entering the cell in real time. We've only seen still photos of an electron microscopic of what is believed to be a virus entering the cell. 

But, what if the photo is of a virus exiting the cell? And, since viruses are unable to replicate themselves, even if they enter a cell through the cell membrane via inhalation, they would have to become incorporated into the genetic code of the cells, and then an epigenetic factor, or factors, would have to turn them on, and even then enough of the viruses would need to be produced to come close to causing symptoms of an infection. 

Since viruses are produced all the time inside the cells of our bodies from epigenetic factors signaling our genome to manufacturer them, and we are breathing in viruses and virus-like particles all the time, and we are rarely sick, the mere presence of a virus in the cell, or replication of them inside the cells, is not sufficient to lead to infection, or be called an infection. 

Therefore, the isolation of a virus, or viral material, in and of itself, is not sufficient to prove causation. And, Meryl, a virus, in and of itself, cannot cause disease without a genetic mechanism for it to be turned on, replicated, and enough of it produced to cause symptoms. This process is not guaranteed with mere exposure alone. How many people have viral illnesses, and kiss and sleep with people who never get ill. They are exposed, alright, but exposure is insufficient to cause illness. Many steps are necessary for the virus to 'take hold' of their genetic mechanisms and produce enough to cause symptoms. 

Besides, a typical viral syndrome presents with an externalization of symptoms. We see it all the time: mucus dripping from the nose, productive coughs, vomiting, diarrhea, bad rashes, loss of taste/smell because of extreme nasal congestion, etc. COVID-19 is presenting as an internalized set of symptoms. This illness is more internal, and only presents with respiratory symptoms (poor oxygenation but good ventilation) secondary to the hypoxia. This is a blood disorder, not a respiratory illness. 


One thing I find hard to wrap my head around is the fact that the virus was only isolated from people who were sick with symptoms. No where in the literature have I seen anything that indicates whether they checked for the presence of the virus in healthy people, at the same time other people were showing symptoms. 

Up until COVID-19, and straight from our medical teaching, in order to confirm this virus is the cause of the actual illness, the researchers and medical doctors needed to demonstrate that the virus was only found in sick people, AND not found in healthy people who have no symptoms. This, apparently, was not done. 

In a situation where a deadly virus is found in sick people, and also found in healthy people who have no symptoms, the only logical and scientific conclusion could be that we don't have a deadly virus as the cause of the illness. Something else is causing their illnesses, and we have yet to fully identify what that might be.

All of these inconsistencies make the virus suspect as the cause of everyone's symptoms.

We have created the term 'asymptomatic carrier,' and are rewriting medical textbooks based on faulty reasoning, and a lack of good science. No one has proven this virus is the cause of the symptoms we are seeing in patients, and no one has shown the mechanism by which a respiratory virus, known to cause upper and lower airway inflammation, is somehow now responsible for hypoxia, uncoupling of oxygen from the red blood cells, increased clotting in veins and arteries, neurological symptoms, loss of taste and smell, dry cough, chest tightness, and extreme body aches, none of which match anything close to what a seasonal flu-like illness looks like.


[1] This article which is due to appear in a peer reviewed journal reveals how Big Shots like Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Mask are making trillions from it. More frightening is what they are doing to enslave humanity.


[2] A ‘Great Reset’ Is Coming… But Not For Capitalism.

[1]  Leading COVID Vaccine Candidates Plagued by Safety ConcernsUnproven technologies, unsafe ingredients and inadequate testing — fortunately, current law prohibits mandating unlicensed vaccines approved for “emergency use.” 

[2] BMJ: Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us.,of%20running%20a%20vaccine%20trial


[2] Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.


[3] A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.


[5] Nosocomial outbreak of COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China.


[7] Isolation and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 from the first US COVID-19 patient.


[8] Replication of SARS-CoV-2 in human respiratory 2 epithelium.


[9] Clinical Course and Molecular Viral Shedding Among Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Community Treatment Center in the Republic of Korea


[11] The elusive definition of Pandemic influenza. The elusive definition of pandemic influenza


[12] Secondary attack rate of COVID-19 in household contacts: a systematic review


[14] Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China


[15] Over 30,000 Health Experts Sign Declaration Against COVID-19 Lockdowns.



[16] UK Government Scientist Admits Lockdown Was a “Monumental Mistake on a Global Scale”  


[17] Coding that led to lockdown was 'totally unreliable' and a 'buggy mess', say experts 


[18] Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx Used Imperial College Model — NOW CONFIRMED AS A COMPLETE FRAUD — To Persuade President Trump to Lock Down Entire US Economy! 


[19] Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus: The Evidence


[20] ‘Verified’ initiative aims to flood digital space with facts amid COVID-19 crisis.


[22] BMJ: Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science

Kamran Abbasi, executive editor


[31] India Moving Towards Herd Immunity As COVID-19 Cases Declining, No Need To Panic Over UK Virus Strain: Health Experts.