Autism is genetic? NOT A CHANCE!
Chris Kirckof
Why has
there been an exponential rise in autism? Why has there been skyrocketing rates
of childhood cancer? Why are kids today sicker than any other generation? It's the vaccines...it's always been the vaccines. They
are making everyone look at anything but the vaccines. Why do you think they
haven't found the answer to those questions...they aren't looking because they
have known the whole time.
Autism is genetic? NOT A CHANCE
Everyday prostitution organizations like the
CDC and mainstream media attempt to push more propaganda into the genetic myth
of autism. When trapped by a lack of evidence, defenders of a nefarious
position resort to their old standby…the epidemiological study. Statisticians
will tell you that the least reliable type of study is an epidemiological study
because it is easy to manipulate the data so that the study tells you anything
you wish it to. Every defense offered by vaccine defenders is based on such studies
and never the actual science. Then they announce that the issue is settled and
no further studies need be done
“Genetic drift,” the amount genes change over
time, is 1% per 100 years. With such a slow pace of change, there can be no
such thing as a sudden ‘genetic epidemic.’ The autism epidemic (at about ‘1 in
36’) cannot be due to genetic drift.
If autism were genetic, because it affects more males than females, geneticists
teach us that it would have to be to an X-chromosome-linked disorder. (Girls, having
two X chromosomes, would then have a redundant good chromosome, so the disorder
would not manifest as often in females as in males who have only one X
chromosome.) For a girl to have autism then, she would need to receive a
defective X-chromosome from each parent, meaning they both carried the defect.
The problem lies in the fact that if the father has the defect to pass onto his
daughter, and it is on his only X-chromosome, then he should be affected by the
disorder as well. Since autistic daughters rarely, if ever, have autistic
fathers, the theory that “autism is genetic” fails because its claim does not
match the empirical evidence. Corresponding to the sharply increasing level of
mercury and aluminum in the immunization schedule globally, which started in
the late 1980’s, there has been an increasing rate of autism among children.
This also explains why autism among 40-, 50-, 60-, 70- and 80-year-olds is not
epidemic, but rather rare. Those over 30 did not routinely get levels of
vaccine-related neurotoxic exposure high enough to cause autism.
Autism
diagnosis sit at 1 in 36 and 1 in 27.5 for males. Researchers have established
that testosterone increases the toxicity of mercury, while estrogen protects
from it. Therefore, at the level contained in our vaccines, mercury affects
boys disproportionately due to their having higher testosterone levels.
Research shows that those with autism had lower levels of glutathione, a
powerful antioxidant that helps our body clear toxins. Testosterone blocks the
body’s ability to make glutathione and that mercury binds to glutathione, thus
inactivating whatever stores the body may already have. Mercury also raises
testosterone levels, while dramatically lowering glutathione. At special risk
would be those individuals who have a family history of low estrogen and high
testosterone.
Post a Comment