Homeopathy: Success and Opposition in Odisha
Homeopathy: Success
and Opposition in Odisha
-
Jagannath Chatterjee
(Published in Annual
MFC Bulletin, July 2013-February 2014)
The state of Odisha has four
government homeopathic medical colleges at Bhubaneswar, Sambalpur, Rourkela and
Berhampore offering 5.5 year BHMS courses. There are also two private
institutions offering recognised BHMS degrees at Cuttack and Baripada. While the
government colleges have a capacity of 25 seats each, the private colleges have
30 seats to offer. So the system is expected to produce 160 doctors every year.
There are also many homeopathy lovers practicing in the state, mostly as
registered practitioners, who are popular and given due importance and respect
by the homeopathic fraternity. A few mainstream doctors also practice
homeopathy though it is not known what drew them to the practice.
The graduates open clinics, in
urban or rural areas, or sit in homeopathy retail shops which are mostly owned
by doctors. They wait in vain for low paying AYUSH jobs. They gain clinical
experience during their student days by assisting their professors and teachers
in their practice mostly in the hospitals and also help out in their private
clinics. Since the year 2005 the Odisha Homeopathic Druggists Association
(OHDA) is taking considerable initiative in adding to their knowledge base by
organising bi-annual conferences in the month of December where reputed
homeopaths and research scientists from all over India participate to share
their clinical experience, research, and videotaped case studies which have to
be seen to be believed. They interact with their colleagues and students to ignite
their interest and impart vital tips for practice. Officials from the Central
Council for Research in Homeopathy (CCRH) and AYUSH officials are often
present.
All kinds of people seek
treatment as the success stories have spread by word of mouth. The early
homeopaths engaged in lot of hard work to make homeopathy popular in the state
and it was they who initiated the setting up of medical colleges. The elite
intelligentsia frequent homeopaths as they have read homeopathy themselves or
have senior family members who have practiced the science on their families.
The elderly prefer the system because of its gentle effects and parents of
small children depend upon it as they do not wish to drug their kids very
often. The poor and middle class take to homeopathy to keep down medical
expenses. There is the general perception that homeopathy is an answer to
chronic illnesses and can also prevent surgical interventions in select cases.
People getting mainstream treatments supplement their treatment with homeopathy
and it is not unusual for relatives to smuggle in homeopathic medicines into hospitals
to treat admitted relatives.
In general the homeopaths of the
state stay aloof and do not overtly criticise any other system. However the
mainstream doctors are highly critical of them and berate their patients for
taking resort to homeopathy as a complementary system. The patients therefore
prefer to remain silent on the issue and will hide the fact that they seek
homeopathic help. The homeopaths say that they are comfortable that mainstream
medicos are around because these days they face very complicated cases and they
have often to be referred to mainstream practitioners in case of emergencies.
In the process they also make friends within the mainstream system and these
doctors are more tolerant of their patients’ preferences. The homeopaths point
out that despite the explosion of multi-speciality hospitals in the state, the
patients seeking their help are only increasing in number. The homeopathic drug
companies are also witnessing increase in sales and almost all major
homeopathic brands have a presence in the state.
Privately the senior doctors
resent the fate of their patients who are mostly swayed between their own
preference and pressure from family members, relatives and neighbours. The
emergence of major hospitals has made it a fad for patients to be admitted in
hospitals and people not doing so are criticised for resorting to homeopathy
‘to keep down expenses’ and ‘harm the patient’. Classical homeopathic
treatment, very essential for permanent cures, often result in disease
aggravations or the re-emergence of old diseases suppressed earlier and during
such episodes the frightened family members go into the care of mainstream
doctors who utilize the opportunity to malign homeopathy. Subtle manipulations
in the course curriculum have ensured that controversial subjects very
essential to understand the plight of patients have been deleted. Mainstream
doctors who teach the students anatomy, physiology and etiology do their bit
to demoralise the students. As homeopathy rarely requires patients to be
hospitalised, the budding doctors complete their residency in mainstream
hospitals further adding to their confusion.
The state’s lack of will to
promote homeopathy, the constant criticism against the science, and
disturbances in the functioning of the colleges ensure that generally the
lowest rung seek admission. Homeopathy being a highly intuitive science
tackling the person as a whole requires a perspective that only a very experienced
doctor can gain. The newbie’s get frustrated as their disease-medicine approach
does not always work. There are remedies
that are very similar and require in depth knowledge of the remedy and the
patient which the youngsters lack. Homeopathy requires extensive case taking,
and lengthy follow up interviews during the course of treatment which requires
time, energy and resources that few doctors can afford today. They cannot make
a living of practice alone and open pharmacies where they become fully absorbed
gradually. These lacunae have resulted in patents (mixtures of remedies) entering
the market which may relieve symptoms but do little to lead to cures that is
the core strength of homeopathy, though I must say that patents do work in
emergencies. But their use destroys the skill of the homeopath in choosing
individual remedies appropriate for their patients. It has also led to multiple
remedies being prescribed which is against the principles of classical
homeopathy.
This fall in standards can be
checked by publicizing the many benefits of homeopathy and distributing homeopathic
knowledge and approach among the lay persons. The doctors have to struggle to
get the vital symptoms from the patients as the general population has become
used to diagnosis on the basis of pathological tests. Convinced of this
approach they do not observe the peculiarities of their discomfort, timings of
amelioration and aggravation, mental states; symptoms that are vital for a good
homeopathic prescription. The symptoms are usually very difficult to obtain as
they are masked by drug effects or get lost in drug side effects.
The medical colleges have to be
spruced up and disciplined so that admission procedures, classes, and
examinations are streamlined. The condition of the hostels has to improve.
Currently most students prefer to stay in rented houses to avoid the pathetic
state of the hostels. The vacancies in teaching posts have to be filled up.
Visiting faculty from within the nation and abroad should be entertained. The
students should be asked to rely mainly on traditional texts rather than on
test papers and guide books. The condition of the inpatient and outpatient
departments should improve as the rise in patient flow will mean better
exposure for senior students. The interference of non-homeopaths should be
curtailed.
At Bhubaneswar a few homeopathic
doctors wish to have the right to prescribe vitamins and supplements as they
face patients depleted of their vital force, a force that is very essential for
the patient to respond and head towards a cure. They do not seek any other
concessions. Frustrated by their meager income many of them have their children
educated in mainstream. It is often interesting to see these doctors sitting in
their parent’s clinics and wondering how a bogus and fake science can get
results. This is despite their own experiences in childhood. This reflects on
the system of teaching they receive which programmes them to hate and
disbelieve all other systems.
I have practiced homeopathy for
some time, a long time serving as an assistant to a local registered doctor who
as a government Medical Officer had served extensively in rural areas gathering
a lot of experience and a record of cured cases behind him. He was very
outspoken about meddling with disease symptoms that only drives the disease
further inside the body leading to severe complications which are almost
impossible to treat. He was happy in rural areas serving the poor who could
afford only homeopathy. His case records showed cures of various chronic
illnesses and treatment of cancer patients given up by the mainstream. I myself
have observed a terminal cancer patient surviving more than a decade under his
care. Incidentally his own wife suffered from cancer whom he treated himself
despite severe opposition from family members. He belonged to an aristocratic
family and held an important post in the state government. However a tiff with
higher ups led to his resignation and he took up a very uncertain career. His
wife was the only person to stand by his decision.
Homeopathy has to be revived and
popularized keeping in mind the steep rise in case of complicated chronic
illnesses, the need for a choice for people who wish to be permanently relieved
from their suffering, and for the general population who are turning paupers
paying hefty medical bills. It has to be remembered that the more the choice,
the better for the patients. The doctors should stop fighting amongst each
other and appreciate the benefits of the various systems. After all, the duty of every doctor is the
restoration of health and not bickering over which system is better and
scientific. Let the results show, by offering every system a level playing
field, and guide the patients to what they think is best.
Post a Comment