BMJ Study of Clinical Trials of Homeopathy

BMJ. 1991 February 9; 302(6772): 316–323.
PMCID: PMC1668980

Clinical trials of homoeopathy.


OBJECTIVE--To establish whether there is evidence of the efficacy of homoeopathy from controlled trials in humans. DESIGN--Criteria based meta-analysis. Assessment of the methodological quality of 107 controlled trials in 96 published reports found after an extensive search. Trials were scored using a list of predefined criteria of good methodology, and the outcome of the trials was interpreted in relation to their quality. SETTING--Controlled trials published world wide. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Results of the trials with the best methodological quality. Trials of classical homoeopathy and several modern varieties were considered separately. RESULTS--In 14 trials some form of classical homoeopathy was tested and in 58 trials the same single homoeopathic treatment was given to patients with comparable conventional diagnosis. Combinations of several homoeopathic treatments were tested in 26 trials; isopathy was tested in nine trials. Most trials seemed to be of very low quality, but there were many exceptions. The results showed a positive trend regardless of the quality of the trial or the variety of homeopathy used. Overall, of the 105 trials with interpretable results, 81 trials indicated positive results whereas in 24 trials no positive effects of homoeopathy were found. The results of the review may be complicated by publication bias, especially in such a controversial subject as homoeopathy. CONCLUSIONS--At the moment the evidence of clinical trials is positive but not sufficient to draw definitive conclusions because most trials are of low methodological quality and because of the unknown role of publication bias. This indicates that there is a legitimate case for further evaluation of homoeopathy, but only by means of well performed trials.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.7M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available forSelected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Knipschild P, Kleijnen J, ter Riet G. Belief in the efficacy of alternative medicine among general practitioners in The Netherlands. Soc Sci Med. 1990;31(5):625–626. [PubMed]
  • Reilly DT, Taylor MA, McSharry C, Aitchison T. Is homoeopathy a placebo response? Controlled trial of homoeopathic potency, with pollen in hayfever as model. Lancet. 1986 Oct 18;2(8512):881–886. [PubMed]
  • Altman DG, Doré CJ. Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials. Lancet. 1990 Jan 20;335(8682):149–153. [PubMed]
  • Ferley JP, Zmirou D, D'Adhemar D, Balducci F. A controlled evaluation of a homoeopathic preparation in the treatment of influenza-like syndromes. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1989 Mar;27(3):329–335. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mayaux MJ, Guihard-Moscato ML, Schwartz D, Benveniste J, Coquin Y, Crapanne JB, Poiterin B, Rodary M, Chevrel JP, Mollet M. Controlled clinical trial of homoeopathy in postoperative ileus. Lancet. 1988 Mar 5;1(8584):528–529. [PubMed]
  • Wiesenauer M, Gaus W. Double-blind trial comparing the effectiveness of the homeopathic preparation Galphimia potentiation D6, Galphimia dilution 10(-6) and placebo on pollinosis.Arzneimittelforschung. 1985;35(11):1745–1747. [PubMed]
  • Zell J, Connert WD, Mau J, Feuerstake G. Behandlung von akuten Sprunggelenksdistorsionen. Doppelblindstudie zum Wirksamkeitsnachweis eines homöopathischen Salbenpräparats. Fortschr Med. 1988 Feb 20;106(5):96–100. [PubMed]
  • Wiesenauer M, Häussler S, Gaus W. Pollinosis-Therapie mit Galphimia glauca. Fortschr Med.1983 May 5;101(17):811–814. [PubMed]
  • Maiwald VL, Weinfurtner T, Mau J, Connert WD. Therapie des grippalen Infekts mit einem homöopathischen Kombinationspräparat im Vergleich zu Acetylsalicylsäure. Kontrollierte, randomisierte Einfachblindstudie. Arzneimittelforschung. 1988 Apr;38(4):578–582. [PubMed]
  • Wiesenauer M, Gaus W, Bohnacker U, Häussler S. Wirksamkeitsprüfung von homöopathischen Kombinationspräparaten bei Sinusitis. Ergebnisse einer randomisierten Doppelblindstudie under Praxisbedingungen. Arzneimittelforschung. 1989 May;39(5):620–625. [PubMed]
  • Gassinger CA, Wünstel G, Netter P. Klinishe Prüfung zum Nachweis der therapeutischen Wirksamkeit des homöopathischen Arzneimittels Eupatorium perfoliatum D 2 (Wasserhanf composite) bei der Diagnose "Grippaler Infekt"1. Arzneimittelforschung. 1981;31(4):732–736.[PubMed]
  • Ritter H. Ein homöotherapeutischer doppelter Blindversuch und seine Problematik. Hippokrates.1966 Jun 30;37(12):472–476. [PubMed]
  • Hitzenberger G, Korn A, Dorcsi M, Bauer P, Wohlzogen FX. Kontrollierte randomisierte doppelblinde Studie zum Vergleich einer Behandlung von Patienten mit essentieller Hypertonie mit homöopathischen und pharmakologisch wirksamen Medikamenten. Wien Klin Wochenschr.1982 Dec 24;94(24):665–670. [PubMed]
  • Carlini EA, Braz S, Troncone LR, Tufik S, Romanach AK, Pustiglione M, Sposati MC, Cudizio Filho O, Prado MI. Efeito hipnótico de medicaço homeopática e do placebo. Avaliaço pela técnica de "duplo-cego" e "cruzamento". AMB Rev Assoc Med Bras. 1987 May-Jun;33(5-6):83–88.[PubMed]
  • Gibson RG, Gibson SL, MacNeill AD, Buchanan WW. Homoeopathic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation by double-blind clinical therapeutic trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980 May;9(5):453–459. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gibson RG, Gibson SL, MacNeill AD, Gray GH, Dick WC, Buchanan WW. Salicylates and homoeopathy in rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary observations. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Nov;6(5):391–395. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rahlfs VW, Mössinger P. Asa foetida bei Colon irritabile. Doppelblindversuch. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1979 Jan 26;104(4):140–143. [PubMed]
  • Rahlfs VW, Mössinger P. Zur Behandlung des Colon irritabile. Ein multizentrischer plazebo-kontrollierter Doppelblindversuch in der Allgemeinen Praxis. Arzneimittelforschung.1976;26(12):2230–2234. [PubMed]
  • Shipley M, Berry H, Broster G, Jenkins M, Clover A, Williams I. Controlled trial of homoeopathic treatment of osteoarthritis. Lancet. 1983 Jan 15;1(8316):97–98. [PubMed]
  • Fisher P, Greenwood A, Huskisson EC, Turner P, Belon P. Effect of homeopathic treatment on fibrositis (primary fibromyalgia) BMJ. 1989 Aug 5;299(6695):365–366. [PMC free article][PubMed]
  • Leaman AM, Gorman D. Cantharis in the early treatment of minor burns. Arch Emerg Med.1989 Dec;6(4):259–261. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Geiger G. Klinische Erfahrungen mit Traumeel bei Weichteilkontusionen und Frankturen und mit Vertigoheel bei der Commotio cerebri acuta. Med Welt. 1968 May 4;18:1203–1204.[PubMed]
  • Kubista E, Müller G, Spona J. Behandlung der Mastopathie mit zyklischer Mastodynie: Klinische Ergebnisse und Hormonprofile. Gynakol Rundsch. 1986;26(2):65–79. [PubMed]
  • Mergen H. Therapie posttraumatischer Schwellungen mit Traumeel. Beitrag zur Relation "Dosis:Wirkung" eines Kombinationspräparates. Munch Med Wochenschr. 1969 Feb 7;111(6):298–300. [PubMed]
  • Alibeu JP, Jobert J. Aconit en dilution homéopathique et agitation post-opératoire de l'enfant.Pediatrie. 1990;45(7-8):465–466. [PubMed]
  • Kienle G. Wirkung von Carbo Betulae D 6 bei respiratorischer Partialinsuffizienz.Arzneimittelforschung. 1973 Jun;23(6):840–842. [PubMed]
  • Knipschild P. Changing belief in iridology after an empirical study. BMJ. 1989 Aug 19;299(6697):491–492. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group