BREAKING: International organizations write to WHO on vaccine safety.
OPEN LETTER FROM INTERNATIONAL
ORGANISATIONS TO THE WHO ON THE ISSUE OF VACCINE SAFETY
·
To the World Health Organisation and
those attending the meeting of the Global Vaccine Quality Control Laboratories
Network (Rome 25th-27th, September 2018)
·
To the European Parliament, the
European Medicines Agency and the European Directorate for the Quality of
Medicines
Dear members of the World Health Organisation,
By sharing science and joining
efforts towards better health, your organisation has improved the lives of
millions of people, and we are grateful for this. Providing better nutrition,
clean water, improved hygiene, and access to medical care, mortality and
infectious disease have been drastically reduced. Your extraordinary
communication campaign to detect cases of disease and their contacts, and
isolate them, finally led to the eradication of the once devastating smallpox.1
These are great achievements and these noble goals should be further pursued.
Today however, we are facing a new epidemic: chronic disease. In the USA, one
in two adults has a chronic disease and one in four has two or more.2
Obesity, asthma, cancer, immune and
autoimmune diseases, neurological and developmental disorders, are ‘lifestyle
diseases’ mainly caused or aggravated by bad nutrition and toxic load. Vaccines
are administered to healthy individuals to prevent targeted infections, but
their long-term impact on the immune system and their potential role in chronic
disease is not being evaluated. Individual risk of poor outcomes to both
infection and vaccination varies widely and mass vaccination without
proper discrimination at the individual level has led to injuries, death, and
unintended consequences. Recently, independent researchers and laboratories
have discovered that many vaccines are contaminated with retroviruses 3 and
polluted by nanoparticles 4. High levels of aluminium associated with vaccine
adjuvants have been found in the brains of autistic children or in people
suffering from neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease.5, 6
In your previous meeting you
advocated for less independent testing, considered ‘redundant’, in order to
speed up the supply of products.7 The recent administration of 250,000
defective vaccines in China 8, the tragedy of the oral polio campaign in India with over 450,000 cases of
paralysis and death 9, the damage caused by the Dengue vaccine in the
Philippines 10, reports from all over the world of chronic pain and paralysis
after administration of the HPV vaccine,11,12 show that vaccine safety and
efficacy are being tragically disregarded in this drive for fast-tracking
approval and easy certification.
If developing standards and sharing
best practice among controlling bodies is needed, testing by national and
independent laboratories must be maintained, since fraud and technical
hazard from storage or transportation can still occur and biases or new
findings would not be detected. According to your report, « It was noted that
the aims of the network are a good fit with industry’s proposal for risk-based
testing and networking ».13 But this ‘risk-based’ approach geared to reducing
test requirements for vaccines considered of ‘low risk’, seems a dangerous
pursuit.
Many health authorities complain
about vaccine hesitancy, but fail to reassure the public by providing the
safety data they request. All over the world, millions of people have signed
petitions demanding more safety, transparency and independent research, but
decision makers chose fast-tracking instead. To restore confidence lost, we
insist that before any kind of recommendation or authorisation is issued, ALL
vaccines pre-qualified or recommended by the WHO will be submitted to:
• Extensive clinical trials conducted by bodies’
independent from the manufacturers
• Middle- and long-term studies on efficiency and safety,
not ‘days’.
• Tests for carcinogenic properties
• Tests around fertility issues
• Tests on pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and the
developing foetus
• Mutagenic effects (changes induced in the DNA)
• Tests for effects on the neurological system and
development of the brain
• Real inert placebo testing, which is almost never done
on vaccines
We also insist that the WHO should provide studies on:
• Adjuvants and preservatives such as aluminium and
mercury and their bioaccumulation
• Other toxic material used, such as polysorbate, Tween
80, formaldehyde etc
• Vaccine safety and the age of vaccine administration
• The impact of full vaccine schedules on the global
health of a population
• The comparison of vaccinated versus unvaccinated
populations in global health terms
• Viral transmission of people recently vaccinated with
live virus vaccine such as measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, influenza or
oral polio vaccine for example.
In particular, we ask that the use of
combined vaccines and the same-day administration of multiple vaccines be
thoroughly investigated. Figures from India show that the numbers of deaths
within three days following vaccination doubled when using a Pentavalent
(5-in-one) vaccine rather than a triple DTP vaccine. It is projected that this
change will cause between 7020 and 8190 deaths each year in infants in India14.
It furthers appears that in confidential periodic safety reports of the hexavalent
Infanrix polio vaccine submitted to the EMA, the manufacturer GSK has deleted a
number of death cases between reports. 15
Concerning the measles-mumps-rubella
vaccine and its link with autism, the only reference mentioned on the autism
section of your website is an out-dated French article translating press claims
that have been disproven in a decision from the English High Court in
2012. 16, 17. While an expert from the CDC has confessed in 2014 to having
manipulated the data of a key reference study, no further investigations have
been made yet.18 With one in 36 children diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum
Disorder in the USA19, this study is an absolute priority and independent
laboratory testing and new clinical trials must now replace the flow of
‘inconclusive’ statistics.
Confirming this priority, an Italian
Parliamentary Commission recently reported numerous deaths, autoimmune diseases
and cancers in military personnel after multiple vaccines had been administered
and called for more research and precautionary measures20. The long-term
effects of vaccines are not studied and the recent revision of the
classification of “Adverse Events Following Immunisation” does not allow for
accurate reporting of death cases or of side effects not previously declared by
the manufacturer.21 With the alarming rise in chronic diseases, immune,
autoimmune and developmental disorders worldwide, immediate responsible action
is imperative.
In its recent resolution on vaccine
hesitancy, the European Parliament calls for “transparency and declaration of
conflicts of interest, including researchers working for the World Health
Organisation and the European Medicines Agency.” It proposes that
“researchers subject to a conflict of interest be excluded from evaluation
panels”; further “calls for the confidentiality of the deliberations of the EMA
evaluation panel to be lifted”; proposes that “the scientific and clinical data
which inform the conclusions of the panel, and whose anonymity is guaranteed in
advance, be made public”. 22 It fails however to question biased reports.23
When it comes to approving or
recommending a new vaccine, we know that:
• Pre-licensure studies are
exclusively carried out by the manufacturers who stand to profit. This is a
clear conflict of interest.
• Pre-licensure studies do not and
cannot capture all adverse events that will occur in real world situations.
• Peer reviewed scientific journals
have huge conflicts of interest and most studies are biased or false 24, 25,
26
• Post-marketing surveillance in all
countries is woefully inadequate. Only 1 to 10% of adverse events are being
reported. In the USA, the mandatory biennial safety reports from US Health
& Human Services to Congress on vaccine safety have simply never been
written. 27
The funding of your organisation
relies on important private donations, such as the GAVI alliance, a partnership
with banks and industries. The fact alone that this very meeting is funded by a
private investor, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 28 is highly
questionable. Given this inherent conflict of interest, it is therefore
absolutely imperative that independent studies and experts be involved in the
approval and recommendations of vaccines and vaccine policies. And if the WHO
guarantees the safety of the vaccine it is pre-qualifying, it should also
assume liability for adverse events following vaccination.
Promoting mandatory vaccination for
entire populations with products that essentially rely on manufacturers’ data
for their general safety and efficacy is an evident breach of the precautionary
principle and as such becomes a forced medical experiment. Since the health
risk of vaccination is entirely borne by individuals, the WHO must ensure that
it is minimal, and that fully informed consent is observed.
In order to restore public trust in
health authorities and improve public health policies worldwide, we therefore
demand actions and answers that meet our requests.
We thank the honourable members of
this assembly for their attention and pray they will open their hearts and
minds to our message.
Signed by
America
Robert Kennedy Jr., Children’s Health Defense, USA
James Lyons-Weiler, the Institute for Pure and Applied
Knowledge, USA
Bernadette Pajer, Informed Choice Washington, USA
Vera Sharav, Alliance for Human Research Protection, USA
Brandy Vaughan, Learn the Risk, USA
Catherine Ford, Vaccine Injury Awareness League,USA
Norma Erikson, Sanevax, USA
Ashleigh Parchman, TN Medical Freedom Alliance
Georgia Coalition for Vaccine Choice - Sandi Marcus
Christina Favazza, Florida health action network
Laura June, Floridians for Medical Freedom
Laura Fisher Andersen, Health Choice CT
Vallie Osborne, Informed Choice-Emerald Coast Florida
Jennifer Black, South Carolina Health Coalition
Lucy Cole, California
Kristen Chevrier and Melissa Andersen, Your Health Freedom
Utah
Alicia Marie, Minnesota Vaccine Freedom Coalition
Elizabeth Murphy, Tennesee Medical Freedom Alliance
Alison Fujito, Pennsylvania Coalition for Informed Consent
Robin Rebrik Stavola, Angela Lockhart, Tom Stavola Jr.,
Hope from Holly Inc.
Erica Dawson, Iowa Vaccine Awareness & Education
Network
Patti Carroll, Vaccine Safety Council of Minnesota
Shanda Burke, Informed Choice Iowa
Sue Fischer Collins, New Jersey Coalition for Vaccine
Choice
Tara Marie, Wisconsin Coalition for Informed Vaccination
Michelle Cotterman, Health Freedom Ohio
Jennifer Larson, The Canary Party
Mark F. Blaxill, Health Choice
Debby Lammam, Medical Freedom Nevada
Stacy Cayce, Oregonians for Medical Freedom
Stephanie Stock, Ohio Advocates for Medical Freedom
Karri Lewis, AWAKE California
Terry Roark, California Coalition for Vaccine Choice
MaryJo Perry, Mississippi Parents for Vaccine Rights
Jennifer Stella, Health Choice Vermont
Yvette Negron-Torres, Virginians for Medical Freedom
Angie Gallagher, Minnesota Vaccine Freedom Coalition
Denise Gonzalez Cosner, New Jersey Medical Freedom Advocates
Jessica Marie, Hawaii for Informed Consent
MacKenzie Strickland Fraser, Health Freedom Florida
Suzanne Waltman, Michigan for Vaccine Choice
Kristen Holland, Tennessee Coalition for Vaccine Choice
Edda West for Vaccine Choice, Canada
Mariano Fernandez Bychowiec, Libertad Sanitaria Argentina
Felipe Gonzalez & Gloria Pizarro Elizalde, Libertad de
Vacunacion, Chile
Sabrina Iglesias, Libertad Sanitaria Uruguay
Europe
Dr. Kris Gaublomme for the European Forum for Vaccine
Vigilance
Aegis Osterreich, Austria
Impffrei, Austria
Dr. Kris Gaublomme, Preventie Vaccinatieschade, Belgium
Inititative Citoyenne, Belgique
Andrei Edrev for Alternative Energy, Bulgaria
Cijepljenje Pravo Izbora, Croatia
Dr. Ivana Delas for the Croatian Association of Parent
Activists, Croatia
Rozalio, Czech Republic
Liga Lidskych Prav, Czech Republic
Vaccinations Forum, Denmark
Suomen Homeopatian Akatemia, Finland
Sophie Guillot for Agir pour le Libre Consentement
Thérapeutique, France
Marie-Rose Cuisigniez, Association Liberté Information
Santé, France
Michel de Lorgeril et Philippe Harvaux, Association
Internationale pour une Médecine Scientifique Indépendante et Bienveillante,
France
Carine Curtet, Association Ametist, France
Dr. Dominique Eraud, Coordination Nationale Médicale Santé
Environnement,
France
Sophie Guillot, Ensemble pour une Vaccination Libre,
France
Marie Werbrègue, Info Vaccin France
Lucie Michel, Les Mamans Courage, France
Patrick Ledrappier, Libre Consentement Eclairé, France
Association Liberté Information Santé, France
Jean-Pierre Eudier, Ligue Nationale pour la Liberté de
Vaccination, France
Cathy Gaches, Reseau des Victimes de la Vaccination
Libertas & Sanitas, Germany
Impfkritik, Germany
Artzen fur Individuelle Impfentscheidung, Germany
Impf-Info, Germany
Eltern fur Impfaufklarung, Germany
Nebancs Viragegyesulet, Hungary
Kotelezo Helyett Valaszthato, Hungary
Regret, Ireland
Irish Vaccination Awareness Group
Ader, Italy
Claudio Simion for Comilva, Italy
Ferdinando Donolato for Corvelva, Veneto, Italy
Colibri, Puglia, Italy
Comitatio Faenza, Italy
Genitori di Cervia per la Libera Scelta, Italy
Genitori del No Obbligo, Lombardia, Italy
Genitori del No Obbligo, Piemonte, Italy
Genitori per la Libera Scelta, Monza e Brianza, Italy
CliVa, Toscana, Italy
E Pur Si Muove, Rimini, Italy
Gruppi Uniti, Italy
Il Sentiero di Nicola, Italy
Libero per Tutti, Forli, Italy
Dr Dario Miedico e Emiliano Gioia, SiAmo, Italy
VacciPiano, Sicilia, Italy
Nepriklausomas Skiepu Informacijo Centras, Lithuania
Colette Welter, Aegis, Luxembourg
Nederlandse Vereniging Kritisch Prikken, The Netherlands
Stichting Vaccinvrij, The Netherlands
Foreningen for Fritt Vaksinevalg, Norway
Justyna Socha, Piotr Jawornik, Ogólnopolskie
Stowarzyszenie Wiedzy o Szczepieniach STOP NOP, Poland
Драгана Тадић, Inicijativa Nova, Citizen’s Initiative for
Optional Vaccination, Serbia
Sloboda v Ockovani, Slovakia
Svood, Slovenia
Asociacion de Afectadas por la Vacuna del Papiloma, Spain
La Liga para la Libertad de Vacunacion, Spain
Sara Boo, NHF, Sweden
Netzwerk Impfentscheid, Switzerland
Infovaccins.ch, Switzerland
John Stone, Age of Autism, UK
Anna Watson, Arnica, UK
Freda Birrell, Association of HPV Vaccine Injured
Daughters,
The Informed Parent, UK
Jabs, Justice, Awareness and Basic Support, UK
Joan Shenton, Immunity Resource Foundation, UK
Australia
Meryl Dorey, Australian Vaccination-Risk Network,
Australia
Elisabeth Hart, Over-vaccination.net, Australia
References
1. « The Global Eradication of Polio » Final Report of
Global Commission for the the Certification of Smallpox Eradication, Geneva,
December 1979, WHO 1980.
2. « About Chronic Disease », Centres for Disease Control
and Prevention, 5 September 2018
3. J. Mikovits & K. Heckenlively « Plague », Skyhorse
Publishing, 2014
4. S. Montanari, A. Gatti « New Control Investigations on
Vaccines : Micro- and Nanocontamination »,
International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, Vol. 4
Issue 1, 23 Jan. 2017
5. C. Exley et al., « Aluminium in Brain Tissue in Autism
», Journal of Trace elements in Medical Biology, March 2018, 46 :76-82
6. C. Exley, « Aluminium and Alzheimer's Disease: The
Science that Describes the Link. Elsevier Science », Amsterdam, The
Netherlands. 2001. 441p
7. Report of the First General Meeting of the WHO-NCL
Network for Biologicals, Noida, India, 31 Oct.-2
Nov.2017.
8. F. Murphy « China Vaccine Scandal : Investigations
Begin into Faulty Rabies and DTaP shots »
British Medical Journal, 25 Jul. 2018, 2018 ; 362 ;k3244
9. Rachana Dhiman , Sandeep C. Prakash, V. Sreenivas ,
Jacob Puliyel. Correlation between Non-Polio
Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency
in India Int J Environ res Public Health 2018;15:1755
10. P. Rana« Initial Philippines Probes Finds Causal
Association Between Deaths and Sanofi Dengue
Vaccine », Wall Street Journal, 2 Feb. 2018
11. P. Goetzsche et al. « Complaint filed to EMA over
Maladministration Related to the Safety of the HPV Vaccine », Nordic Cochrane
12. R. Gherardi « Toxic Story », Actes Sud, Oct. 2016
13. Report of the First General Meeting of the WHO-NCL
Network for Biologicals, Noida, India, 31 Oct.-2
Nov.2017, p. 6, section 3.4
14. J. Puliyel, Jaspreet Kaur, Ashish Puliyel, Visnubhatla
Sreenivas « Deaths Reported after Pentavalent
Vaccine Compared with Death Reported after
Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine: An Exploratory
Analysis. » Med J DY Patil Vidyapeeth 2018;11:99-105.
15. J. Puliyel, SathyamalaC. « Infanrix hexa and sudden
death: a review of the periodic safety update
reports submitted to the European Medicines Agency »,
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2018 Jan-Mar;3(1):43-47
16. High Court Decision of 7 March 2012, between Prof.
John Walker-Smith and the General Medical Council, EWHC 503, Case n°
CO/7039/2010
17. V. Sharav « L’Affaire Wakefield : Shades of Dreyfus
and BMJ’s Descent Into Tabloid Science »,
Alliance for Human Research Protection, 2017
18. Documentary « Vaxxed : from Cover-Up to Catastrophy »
April 2016.
19. B. ZAblotsky et al. « Estimated Prevalence of Children
Diagnosed with Developmental Disabilities in
the United States, 2014-2106 » NCHS Data Brief n°291,
November 2017
20. “Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry into Cases of
Death and Severe Illnesses Affecting Italian
Personnel Assigned to Military Missions Abroad”, Acts of
Parliament, XXII-bisn. 23-bis,Vol. I, II and III ,
Rapporteur G. P. Scanu, Approved 7 Feb. 2018
21. Puliyel J, Naik P Revised World Health Organization
(WHO)’s causality assessment of adverse
events following immunization—a critique https://f1000research.com/ articles/7-243/v2
22. « Vaccine Hesitancy and the drop of Vaccination Rates
in Europe », resolution of the European
Parliament, 19 April 2018. (2017/2951)
23. L. Jorgensen, P. Goetzsche, T. Jefferson «The Cochrane
HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias » BMJ
evidence Based Medicine, July 27th 2018.
24. P. Goetzsche, « A moral governance crisis : the
growing lack of democratic collaboration and scientific pluralism in Cochrane
», open letter 14 Sep. 2018, Nordic Cochrane Centre
25. J. Ioannidis, « Why Most Published Research Findings
are False », PLOS medicine, 30 Aug. 2005
26. M. Angell « The Truth about Pharmaceutical Companies.
How They Deceive Us and what to do About It », Random House, 2004
27. « Mandate for Safer Childhood Vaccines », Decision of
the US District Court, Southern District New
York, Between Informed Consent Action Network and the US
Deparment of Health and Human Services
28. The Bill & Melinda Gates foundation is one the 5
biggest investors in the world. In August 2018, it had 22,114 million $ in
stocks according to gurufocus.com
6 comments
Doctors, medical researchers and drug companies like to persuade all present and potential consumers of health care that medicine is a science and has advanced far beyond the mystical incantations and witch doctor remedies of the past. But modern medicine is not a science and modern clinicians and medical researchers are not scientists. Modern clinicians may use scientific techniques but in the way that they treat their patients they are still quacks.
The foundation of modern, 20th century medical thinking is the Cartesian principle that although the mind and the body are linked they are essentially separate entities. Accordingly, doctors treat the lesion or the organ that they believe to be failing to function properly rather than the patient, his or her fears, and symptoms. They organise laboratory tests and then believe that by treating abnormalities they are acting scientifically.
Read more: http://www.whale.to/a/coleman3.html
In this connection, rea…