Dr. Stefan Lanka Exposes The "Viral Fraud"

Posted by: "Sheri Nakken" 

Wed Sep 27, 2006 4:37 am (PST)

http://www.neue- medizin.com/ lanka2.htm

GO TO WEBSITE FOR PHOTOS (or non-photos ) (and Stefan is gorgeous!)

Dr. Stefan Lanka Exposes The "Viral Fraud" 

Pictures of "Isolated Viruses" Debunked

Dr. Stefan Lanka, virologist and molecular biologist, is internationally
mostly known as an "AIDS dissident" (and maybe "gentechnology dissident")
who has been questioning the very existence of "HIV" since 1994. In the
past years, however, he stumbled over a breathtaking fact: Not even ONE of
the (medically relevant) viruses has ever been isolated; there is no proof
of their existence. Actually, Dr. Lanka has already stated three years ago,
in the almost "legendary" Zenger´s interview: "So for a long time I studied
virology, from the end to the beginning, from the beginning to the end, to
be absolutely sure that there was no such thing as HIV. And it was easy for
me to be sure about this because I realized that the whole group of viruses
to which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses -- as well as other
viruses which are claimed to be very dangerous -- in fact do not exist at
all." So he was thoroughly reading the literature on those "other viruses"
again, and after he could still not find any paper which would provide the
evidence, he encouraged people not to BELIEVE him but to ask the institutes
and authorities themselves. This has actually taken place, mostly initiated
by mothers. The responses were revealing. In September 2001 the German book
"Impfen - Völkermord im dritten Jahrtausend? " (Vaccination - Genocide in
the third millennium?) by Stefan Lanka and Karl Krafeld was published in
which they state that there is still no proof of any (medically relevant)

This movement (klein-klein- aktion ~ many little actions/steps) has a German
website: www.klein-klein- aktion.de which I have taken (and translated) all
the following texts from.

For almost one year we have been asking authorities, politicians and
medical institutes after the scientific evidence for the existence of such
viruses that are said to cause disease and therefore require
"immunization" . After almost one year we have not received even one
concrete answer which provides evidence for the existence of those
"vaccination viruses". The conclusion is inevitable that our children are
still vaccinated on the basis of scientific standards of the 18th and 19th
century. In the 19th century Robert Koch demanded in his generally accepted
postulates evidence of the virus in order to prove infection; at Koch´s
time this evidence couldn´t be achieved directly by visualization and
characterization of the viruses, because adequate technology wasn´t
available at that time. Methods of modern medicine have profoundly changed
over the past 60 years, in particular by the invention of the electron
microscope. And still all these viruses we get immunized against have never
been re-examined using this technology?
Several images and explanations that we were pointed to and that were said
to show resp. describe (characterize) viruses, we showed to Dr. Lanka who
gives his summarizing comments:

[The German original of the following text by Stefan Lanka you can find
here (temporarily not available for technical reasons, Jan 11, 2003)]
All these photos have in common that they, resp. the authors, can´t claim
that they present a virus, as long as they do not also provide the original
publications which describe how and what from the virus has been isolated.
Such original publications are cited nowhere.
Indeed, in the entire scientific literature there´s not even one
publication, where for "viruses in the medicine" the fulfillment of Koch´s
first postulate is even claimed. That means, that there is no proof that
from humans with certain diseases the viruses - which are held responsible
for these diseases - have been isolated. Nevertheless, this is precisely
what they publicly claim. Now, regarding the photos submitted:

1. Many of the photos are colored. This is proof enough, that they are the
(art)work of designers, because electron microscopic photos always appear
in black and white.

2. The images of the so called HIV-, measles (Masern)- and smallpox
(Pocken) viruses clearly show, as the image descriptions partly already
indicate, that these are cells wherein the viruses can allegedly be found.
Thus, nothing has been isolated. The photos actually show cells and typical
endogenous particles in them. These structures are well known and serve the
intra- and intercellular transport. Unlike viruses of the same kind - that
are always the same size and same shape (consistency) -, they differ in
size and shape (consistency) and therefore can´t be isolated.

3. In the case of the influenza- herpes-, vaccinia-, polio-, adeno- and
ebola-viruses each photo shows only a single particle; nobody claims that
they´re isolated particles, let alone particles that have been isolated
from humans.

These particles are partially the cellular particles mentioned above (#2)
resp. typical artifacts which means: structures that accrue after
inappropriate fixing and drying of the probes, while being prepared for the
electron microscope.

4. The "isolated" polio viruses are artificial particles, generated by
suction of an indifferent mass through a very fine filter into a vacuum.
Its structure (no characteristic structures) differ clearly from the ones
of the "viruses" in the cells. Here the information is essential that a
biochemical characterization of those "isolated" viruses, although
"isolation" is claimed, has never been published anywhere nor has anybody
even claimed such a characterization.

5. The photo with the hepatitis B "viruses" does not show isolated
structures, but - as the image title already says, an agglutinate. This is
the scientific/medical term for proteins from the blood that are clumped
together, as is typical for coagulations. Typically, thereby round and also
crystal structures accrue - depending on the condition of the blood sample.

In summary, it must be said that these photos are an attempt of fraud
committed by the researchers and medical scientists involved, as far as
they assert that these structures are viruses or even isolated viruses. To
what extent the involved journalists and authors of textbooks have
contributed to this fraud knowlingly or only out of gross negligence, I
don´t know. Everyone who starts a recherche in the medical literature, will
quickly encounter statements and references that Koch´s first postulate
can´t be fulfilled (i.e. Großgebauer: Eine kurze Geschichte der Mikroben,
1997 ["a little story of the microbes"]; editor: Verlag für angewandte
Wissenschaft) . How these authors who claim the existence of viruses could
overlook that, remains a riddle.

Could it be that the term "Contagium" = "Gift" (poison/toxin) = "Virus"
from the 18th and 19th century was applied in the 20th century to the cell
components which were named "viruses" since the electron microscope was
introduced in 1931? And in order to hide this, the "disease causing
viruses" have often been described but never been isolated? And then they
were used as seemingly logical explanation for poisonings and adverse
affects of vaccination, as Luhmann (1995) (i.e.) writes about the
symptomatic of Hepatitis B, which was observed for the first time in 1985
following smallpox vaccinations, and 1938 following measles vaccinations?
The copies in the textbooks show only structures within cells and nothing
that looks like isolation and thus homogenous. The biochemical
characterization, which is crucial, lacks completely.

Robert Koch and colleagues, Prof. Rush, Prof. Max von Pettenkofer, Prof.
Virchow have shown, for instance by experiments and by observation of the
Henle-Koch´s rules that by transmission of bacteria, the supposed contagium
vivum, it was not possible to cause the same disease. So Robert Koch
modified (weakened) the 3rd postulate of his teacher, the German anatomist
Henle, in the form that the generation of a similar symptom in animal
experiments would be sufficient to prove this hypothesis of disease cause,
namely the hypothesis of infectious bacteria. (See Großgebauer: Eine kurze
Geschichte der Mikroben).

So it does not surprise me that Prof. Alfred Fischer writes in his book
"Vorlesungen über Bakterien" ("[academic] lectures on bacteria") from 1897
(!): "as is true for any infectious disease - the fact that it does not
only take the addition of the bacteria but also the unknown something of
individual predisposition, goes without saying."

Stefan Lanka, Dec 2001
(Translation Juergen Faas, Dec 2001) (minor changes on March 2, 2002)

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK